ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Implications of culture-independent panel-based detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of gastrointestinal pathogen co-detection in pediatric stool samples identified by rapid multiplex PCR.Epidemiology and infection · 2026Article
- Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Panels for Gastrointestinal Infections: Current Evidence, Regulatory Hurdles, and the Way Forward.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Cyclosporiasis-Updates on Clinical Presentation, Pathology, Clinical Diagnosis, and Treatment.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Real-time gastrointestinal infection surveillance through a cloud-based network of clinical laboratories.PloS one · 2021Article
- Performance and Impact of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel on a LargeJournal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Comparison of Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel and Conventional Stool Testing for Evaluation of Patients With HIV Infection.Open forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases.Current infectious disease reports · 2019Review
- Direct-from-Specimen Pathogen Identification: Evolution of Syndromic Panels.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2019Review
- Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray® GastrointestinalPanel in a Midwestern Academic Hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017Article
- Metagenomics: The Next Culture-Independent Game Changer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- Multiplexed Molecular Diagnostics for Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, and Central Nervous System Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Review
- Sample-to-result molecular infectious disease assays: clinical implications, limitations and potential.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016Review
- Multicenter evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel for etiologic diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- How well does physician selection of microbiologic tests identify Clostridium difficile and other pathogens in paediatric diarrhoea? Insights using multiplex PCR-based detection.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2015Article
- Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.