Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23985911›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Evaluation of bactec mycosis IC/F and Plus Aerobic/F blood culture bottles for detection of Candida in the presence of antifungal agents.

Robin Köck, Lea C Eißing, Matthias G Boschin, Björn Ellger, Dagmar Horn, Evgeny A Idelevich, Karsten Becker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Direct Blood Culturing ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of systemic antifungal therapy on the detection of Candida species in blood cultures in clinical cases of candidemia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation of blood culture media for the detection of fungi.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin KöckInstitute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Lea C Eißing
Matthias G Boschin
Björn Ellger
Dagmar Horn
Evgeny A Idelevich
Karsten Becker
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines recommend performing follow-up cultures for patients with candidemia in order to determine the time when Candida is cleared from the bloodstream. Since this requires culturing blood samples from patients undergoing antifungal treatment, we evaluated two blood culture bottles (the Bactec Mycosis IC/F [MICF], specifically adapted to the growth of fungi, and the Bactec Plus Aerobic/F [PAF], containing resins to inactivate anti-infective agents) for their effectiveness in detecting Candida albicans and Candida glabrata when seeded in concentrations of 1 CFU/ml and 10 CFU/ml, respectively, together with human whole blood and various antifungal agents in therapeutic peak serum concentrations (Cmax). Significant differences between the MICF and PAF vials for the detection of Candida spp. were found when inoculated with caspofungin (0/12 versus 8/12) (P < 0.001) or amphotericin B (3/12 versus 12/12) (P < 0.001). Inoculation of fluconazole or voriconazole did not influence the effectiveness of detection in the MICF and PAF bottles (P = 1.0). Neither the MICF nor the PAF bottles detected Candida spp. reliably when seeded together with anidulafungin (1/12 versus 1/12) (P = 1.0) or micafungin (0/12 versus 1/12) (P = 1.0). The times to positivity of both bottles were significantly prolonged when antifungal agents were added compared to those of controls without antimycotic drugs (P < 0.001). Overall, the results of this in vitro study indicate that the PAF bottles detected Candida spp. more reliably than the MICF bottles when supplemented with certain antifungal agents. Consequently, clinical studies should evaluate whether this holds true when blood cultures from patients undergoing antifungal treatment are performed.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandidemiaDrug MonitoringHumansMicrobiological TechniquesTime FactorsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID23985911
PMCPMC3889751
OpenAlexW2125438410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.