ReviewParasitology2014
Open source drug discovery - a limited tutorial.
Review in Parasitology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Professors want to share: preliminary survey results on establishing open-source-endowed professorships.SN social sciences · 2022Article
- Open laboratory notebooks: good for science, good for society, good for scientists.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Imagining the "open" university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education.PLoS biology · 2017Article
- Is Open Science the Future of Drug Development?The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2017Review
- What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review.Research integrity and peer review · 2017Review
- Open Source Drug Discovery: Highly Potent Antimalarial Compounds Derived from the Tres Cantos Arylpyrroles.ACS central science · 2016Article
- Open drug discovery for the Zika virus.F1000Research · 2016Article
- Open access target validation is a more efficient way to accelerate drug discovery.PLoS biology · 2015Article
- Parallel worlds of public and commercial bioactive chemistry data.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2015Article
- Experiences with a researcher-centric ELN.Chemical science · 2015Article
- Finding small molecules for the 'next Ebola'.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Efficient Synthesis and Anti-Tubercular Activity of a Series of Spirocycles: An Exercise in Open Science.PloS one · 2014Article
- Freeze-fracture investigation of the red pulp of human spleen.Virchows Archiv. B, Cell pathology including molecular pathology · 1989Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Open science is a new concept for the practice of experimental laboratory-based research, such as drug discovery. The authors have recently gained experience in how to run such projects and here describe some straightforward steps others may wish to take towards more openness in their own research programmes. Existing and inexpensive online tools can solve many challenges, while some psychological barriers to the free sharing of all data and ideas are more substantial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.