SynthesisAmerican journal of health behavior2013
Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.
Synthesis in American journal of health behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2016Trial
- Editorial: Social Inequality in Cancer Screening.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Exome sequencing study in a clinical research setting finds general acceptance of study returning secondary genomic findings with little decisional conflict.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Diagnostic tool or screening programme? Asymptomatic testing for SARS-CoV-2 needs clear goals and protocols.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2021Review
- Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Article
- Tissue vs Liquid Biopsies for Cancer Detection: Ethical Issues.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019Article
- What is in a Name? Parent, Professional and Policy-Maker Conceptions of Consent-Related Language in the Context of Newborn Screening.Public health ethics · 2019Article
- How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Review
- Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Article
- Patient-rated importance of key information on screening colonoscopy in Germany: a survey of statutory health insurance members.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Systematically Developing a Web-Based Tailored Intervention Promoting HPV-Vaccination Acceptability Among Mothers of Invited Girls Using Intervention Mapping.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Common methods of measuring 'informed choice' in screening participation: Challenges and future directions.Preventive medicine reports · 2016Review
- Predispositions to Lymphoma: A Practical Review for Genetic Counselors.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Review
- Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
- Response and participation of underserved populations after a three-step invitation strategy for a cardiometabolic health check.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2015Article
- Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Effect of providing risk information on undergoing cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2015Article
- "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of health screening interventions aimed at enhancing informed choice.
methodsStudies were selected if (1) they were randomized controlled trials conducted between January 1, 2000, and March 30, 2010, (2) participants in one arm underwent a prescreening intervention aimed at improving informed choice, and (3) informed choice was the primary outcome.
resultsEight studies that met the inclusion criteria involved screening for prostate, colorectal and breast cancer, and diabetes. Five of the 8 prescreening interventions led to greater informed choice.
conclusionsWith researchers mindful of the limited number of studies, findings were encouraging, but conclusions regarding the most effective ways of facilitating informed choice for screening are at best tentative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.