Trial reportAmerican journal of health behavior2013
Contrasts in rural and urban barriers to colorectal cancer screening.
Trial report in American journal of health behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics.Family practice · 2016Trial
- A Media and Clinic Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ohio Appalachia.BioMed research international · 2015Trial
- Perceptions of and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Underserved Baltimore and Eastern Shore Populations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Developing a co-production strategy to facilitate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening interventions for rural health systems: a pilot study.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Cancer Screening among Rural People Who Use Drugs: Colliding Risks and Barriers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- State health disparities research in Rural America: Gaps and future directions in an era of COVID-19.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021Article
- Health Literacy Research in Rural Areas.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2020Article
- Factors Determining Patients' Choice Between Mobile Health and Telemedicine: Predictive Analytics Assessment.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.JMIR human factors · 2019Article
- Conducting a randomized trial in rural and urban safety-net health centers: Added value of community-based participatory research.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2018Article
- Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers.Journal of community health · 2018Article
- Generalized Linear Mixed Model Analysis of Urban-Rural Differences in Social and Behavioral Factors for Colorectal Cancer ScreeningAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.Journal of community health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo contrast barriers to colon cancer (CRC) screening and Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) completion between rural and urban safety-net patients.
methodsInterviews were administered to 972 patients who were not up-to-date with screening.
resultsRural patients were more likely to believe it was helpful to find CRC early (89.7% vs 66.1%, p < .0001), yet were less likely to have received a screening recommendation (36.4% vs. 45.8%, p = .03) or FOBT information (14.5% vs 32.3%, p < .0001) or to have completed an FOBT (22.0% vs 45.8%, p < .0001).
conclusionsInterventions are needed to increase screening recommendation, education and completion, particularly in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.