Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23985047›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2013

Real-time PCR assay in differentiating Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii infections in Orang Asli settlements in Malaysia.

Yee Ling Lau, Claudia Anthony, Siti Aminah Fakhrurrazi, Jamaiah Ibrahim, Init Ithoi, Rohela Mahmud

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Taxonomy of the GenusPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Evaluation of Each ThreeMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of a salivary IgA detection method for accurate diagnosis of amebiasis.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TheCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yee Ling LauTropical Infectious Disease Research and Education Center (TIDREC), Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. lauyeeling@um.edu.my.
Claudia Anthony
Siti Aminah Fakhrurrazi
Jamaiah Ibrahim
Init Ithoi
Rohela Mahmud
University of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica is the third leading cause of death worldwide. This pathogenic amoeba is morphologically indistinguishable from E. dispar and E. moshkovskii, the non-pathogenic species. Polymerase chain reaction is the current method of choice approved by World Health Organization. Real-time PCR is another attractive molecular method for diagnosis of infectious diseases as post-PCR analyses are eliminated and turnaround times are shorter. The present work aimed to compare the results of Entamoeba species identification using the real-time assay against the established nested PCR method.

methodsIn this study, a total of 334 human faecal samples were collected from different Orang Asli settlements. Faecal samples were processed by direct wet smear and formalin ethyl acetate concentration methods followed by iodine staining and was microscopically examined for Entamoeba species and other intestinal parasites. Microscopically positive samples were then subject to nested PCR and real-time PCR.

resultsThe overall prevalence of Entamoeba infection was 19.5% (65/334). SK Posh Piah recorded highest Entamoeba prevalence (63.3%) while Kampung Kemensah had the lowest prevalence (3.7%) of Entamoeba. Microscopically positive samples were then tested by real-time PCR and nested PCR for the presence of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii infection. Real-time PCR showed higher Entamoeba detection (86.2%) compared to nested PCR (80%), although the McNemar test value showed no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.221).

conclusionsThis study is the first in Malaysia to report the use of real-time PCR in identifying and differentiating the three Entamoeba infections. It is also proven to be more effective compared to the conventional nested PCR molecular method.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolEntamoebaEntamoebiasisFecesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInfantMalaysiaMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitologyReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID23985047
PMCPMC3765902
OpenAlexW2156127686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.