ArticleBMC genomics2013
The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue-specific transcriptomic analysis of accelerated reproductive development of immature Queensland fruit fly induced by raspberry ketone ingestion.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Patterns of the Genes Involved in the Integrity and Segregation of Chromosomes in Sawflies (Hymenoptera: Symphyta).Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Temperature changes reveal different transcriptional responses in the larvae of the bark beetle Dendroctonus rhizophagus during the cold season.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- From whole bodies to single cells: A guide to transcriptomic approaches for ecology and evolutionary biology.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Localized Tissue-Specific Gene Expression and Gene Duplications are Important Sources of Social Morph Differences in a Social Bumblebee.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative transcriptomics identifies genes underlying growth performance of the Pacific black-lipped pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Decoding bee cleptoparasitism through comparative transcriptomics of Coelioxoides waltheriae and its host Tetrapedia diversipes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Design, execution, and interpretation of plant RNA-seq analyses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- The genome sequence of a cockchafer,Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Temperature and livestock grazing trigger transcriptome responses in bumblebees along an elevational gradient.iScience · 2022Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic Responses of the Honey Bee Brain to Infection with Deformed Wing Virus.Viruses · 2021Article
- Coupling Transcriptomics and Behaviour to Unveil the Olfactory System of Spodoptera exigua Larvae.Journal of chemical ecology · 2020Article
- Article
- Biogeographic parallels in thermal tolerance and gene expression variation under temperature stress in a widespread bumble bee.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Overexpression of Placental Growth Factor in Stromal Cells from Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Another Piece in the Puzzle?European urology open science · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Caste- and pesticide-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticide exposure on gene expression in bumblebees.Molecular ecology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA composite biological structure, such as an insect head or abdomen, contains many internal structures with distinct functions. Composite structures are often used in RNA-seq studies, though it is unclear how expression of the same gene in different tissues and structures within the same structure affects the measurement (or even utility) of the resulting patterns of gene expression. Here we determine how complex composite tissue structure affects measures of gene expression using RNA-seq.
resultsWe focus on two structures in the honey bee (the sting gland and digestive tract) both contained within one larger structure, the whole abdomen. For each of the three structures, we used RNA-seq to identify differentially expressed genes between two developmental stages, nurse bees and foragers. Based on RNA-seq for each structure-specific extraction, we found that RNA-seq with composite structures leads to many false negatives (genes strongly differentially expressed in particular structures which are not found to be differentially expressed within the composite structure). We also found a significant number of genes with one pattern of differential expression in the tissue-specific extraction, and the opposite in the composite extraction, suggesting multiple signals from such genes within the composite structure. We found these patterns for different classes of genes including transcription factors.
conclusionsMany RNA-seq studies currently use composite extractions, and even whole insect extractions, when tissue and structure specific extractions are possible. This is due to the logistical difficultly of micro-dissection and unawareness of the potential errors associated with composite extractions. The present study suggests that RNA-seq studies of composite structures are prone to false negatives and difficult to interpret positive signals for genes with variable patterns of local expression. In general, our results suggest that RNA-seq on large composite structures should be avoided unless it is possible to demonstrate that the effects shown here do not exist for the genes of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.