Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23984833›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

The impact of breed and tissue compartment on the response of pig macrophages to lipopolysaccharide.

Ronan Kapetanovic, Lynsey Fairbairn, Alison Downing, Dario Beraldi, David P Sester, Tom C Freeman, Christopher K Tuggle, Alan L Archibald, David A Hume

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Immunopeptidomics ofBiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcriptomic Analysis of Rat Macrophages.Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ronan KapetanovicThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, United Kingdom. david.hume@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
Lynsey Fairbairn
Alison Downing
Dario Beraldi
David P Sester
Tom C Freeman
Christopher K Tuggle
Alan L Archibald
David A Hume
Roslin Institute · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBCancer Research UK · GBInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F003722/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G004013/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I001107/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211552Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20251969Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/R/00001620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe draft genome of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa) has recently been published permitting refined analysis of the transcriptome. Pig breeds have been reported to differ in their resistance to infectious disease. In this study we examine whether there are corresponding differences in gene expression in innate immune cells

resultsWe demonstrate that macrophages can be harvested from three different compartments of the pig (lungs, blood and bone-marrow), cryopreserved and subsequently recovered and differentiated in CSF-1. We have performed surface marker analysis and gene expression profiling on macrophages from these compartments, comparing twenty-five animals from five different breeds and their response to lipopolysaccharide. The results provide a clear distinction between alveolar macrophages (AM) and monocyte-derived (MDM) and bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM). In particular, the lung macrophages express the growth factor, FLT1 and its ligand, VEGFA at high levels, suggesting a distinct pathway of growth regulation. Relatively few genes showed breed-specific differential expression, notably CXCR2 and CD302 in alveolar macrophages. In contrast, there was substantial inter-individual variation between pigs within breeds, mostly affecting genes annotated as being involved in immune responses.

conclusionsPig macrophages more closely resemble human, than mouse, in their set of macrophage-expressed and LPS-inducible genes. Future research will address whether inter-individual variation in macrophage gene expression is heritable, and might form the basis for selective breeding for disease resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsGene Expression RegulationHomeostasisImmunity, InnateLeukocytes, MononuclearLipopolysaccharidesMacrophages, AlveolarMultigene FamilyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityPrincipal Component AnalysisSpecies SpecificitySus scrofaTranscriptomeLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID23984833
PMCPMC3766131
OpenAlexW2156051095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.