Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23984642›Full record

ReviewAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2013

New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?

Matteo Bassetti, Maria Merelli, Chiara Temperoni, Augusta Astilean

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A combination of photodynamic therapy and antimicrobial compounds to treat skin and mucosal infections: a systematic review.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Ability of Bacteriophages to Reduce Biofilms Produced byAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Carbapenem-resistantiScience · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Division, Santa Maria Misercordia Hospital, Udine, Italy. mattba@tin.it.
Maria Merelli
Chiara Temperoni
Augusta Astilean

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is growing up day by day in both community and hospital setting, with a significant impact on the mortality and morbidity rates and the financial burden that is associated. In the last two decades multi drug resistant microorganisms (both hospital- and community-acquired) challenged the scientific groups into developing new antimicrobial compounds that can provide safety in use according to the new regulation, good efficacy patterns, and low resistance profile. In this review we made an evaluation of present data regarding the new classes and the new molecules from already existing classes of antibiotics and the ongoing trends in antimicrobial development. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) supported a proGram, called "the '10 × ´20' initiative", to develop ten new systemic antibacterial drugs within 2020. The microorganisms mainly involved in the resistance process, so called the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and enterobacteriaceae) were the main targets. In the era of antimicrobial resistance the new antimicrobial agents like fifth generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, β-lactamases inhibitors, aminoglycosides, quinolones, oxazolidones, glycopeptides, and tetracyclines active against Gram-positive pathogens, like vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) and MRSA, penicillin-resistant streptococci, and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) but also against highly resistant Gram-negative organisms are more than welcome. Of these compounds some are already approved by official agencies, some are still in study, but the need of new antibiotics still does not cover the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore the management of antimicrobial resistance should also include fostering coordinated actions by all stakeholders, creating policy guidance, support for surveillance and technical assistance.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDrug DiscoveryDrugs, InvestigationalHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrugs, Investigational

Identifiers

PMID23984642
PMCPMC3846448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.