Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23984377›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2013

Diagnosis value of the serum amyloid A test in neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis.

Haining Yuan, Jie Huang, Bokun Lv, Wenying Yan, Guang Hu, Jian Wang, Bairong Shen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Neonatal Sepsis.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2020
    Review
  16. Necrotizing enterocolitis: It's not all in the gut.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haining YuanCenter for Systems Biology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Jie Huang
Bokun Lv
Wenying Yan
Guang Hu
Jian Wang
Bairong Shen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis (NS), a common disorder for humans, is recognized as a leading global public health challenge. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the serum amyloid A (SAA) test for diagnosing NS. The studies that evaluated the SAA test as a diagnostic marker were searched in Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Network between January 1996 and June 2013. A total of nine studies including 823 neonates were included in our meta-analysis. Quality of each study was evaluated by the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool (QUADAS). The SAA test showed moderate accuracy in the diagnosis of NS both at the first suspicion of sepsis and 8-96 h after the sepsis onset, both with Q* = 0.91, which is similar to the PCT and CRP tests for the diagnosis of NS in the same period. Heterogeneity between studies was also explained by cut-off point, SAA assay, and age of included neonates. On the basis of our meta-analysis, therefore, SAA could be promising and meaningful in the diagnosis of NS.

Indexed as

Serum Amyloid A ProteinBiomarkersGenetic HeterogeneityHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesPublication BiasROC CurveSepsisBiomarkersSerum Amyloid A Protein

Identifiers

PMID23984377
PMCPMC3747616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.