Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23984031›Full record

ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2013

Improving vaginal examinations performed by midwives.

Rhoda S Muliira, Vidya Seshan, Shanthi Ramasubramaniam

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05672511 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Simulation Teaching Method on Midwifery Students' Knowledge and Skills of Vaginal Examination in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled82ConditionsEducational ProblemsArmsSimulation Teaching Method
NCT05971927 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Simulation Teaching Method on Vaginal Examination Practice Skills and Self-Confidence Development in Labor in Midwifery Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorTokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled66ConditionsVaginal ExaminationArmsSimulation education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Predicting Vaginal Delivery Success: Role of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound Angle of Descent at a Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhoda S MuliiraCollege of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Vidya Seshan
Shanthi Ramasubramaniam
Sultan Qaboos University · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vaginal examination (VE) is an essential part of midwifery care, and is routinely performed when assessing the progress of labour. As evidence shows that during labour women may find VEs unpleasant, embarrassing and sometimes painful, the aim of this article is to review literature on the use of VEs during labour and to synthesise information from the available literature on how to provide an effective VE. The studies considered were retrieved from three databases (the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], SCOPUS and MEDLINE) using the following search terms: "VEs in labour", "midwives and use of VEs" and "women experiences of VEs in labour". The literature reviewed suggests that midwives are not careful about VEs. Therefore, a concerted effort is needed to pay attention to the frequency of VEs, the management of pain and distress, information-giving and the preferences of the patient, so that the patient can feel in control during a VE.

Indexed as

LabourMidwiferyMidwifery careVaginaVaginal Examination

Identifiers

PMID23984031
PMCPMC3749030
OpenAlexW1746662729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.