Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23983223›Full record

SynthesisPrenatal diagnosis2013

The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature.

Jonathan L A Callaway, Lisa G Shaffer, Lyn S Chitty, Jill A Rosenfeld, John A Crolla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prenatal diagnosis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03955588 (Demonstration Trial on Replacement of Cytogenetics by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03955588 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Demonstration Trial on Replacement of Cytogenetics by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (aCGH) in Prenatal Diagnosis

TypeobservationalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2014 to 2016Enrolled51ConditionsPrenatal DiagnosisArmsaCGH
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan L A CallawayWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK.
Lisa G Shaffer
Lyn S Chitty
Jill A Rosenfeld
John A Crolla

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical utility of microarray technologies when used in the context of prenatal diagnosis lies in the technology's ability to detect submicroscopic copy number changes that are associated with clinically significant outcomes. We have carried out a systematic review of the literature to calculate the utility of prenatal microarrays in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype. Amongst 12,362 cases in studies that recruited cases from all prenatal ascertainment groups, 295/12,362 (2.4%) overall were reported to have copy number changes with associated clinical significance (pCNC), 201/3090 (6.5%) when ascertained with an abnormal ultrasound, 50/5108 (1.0%) when ascertained because of increased maternal age and 44/4164 (1.1%) for all other ascertainment groups (e.g. parental anxiety and abnormal serum screening result). When additional prenatal microarray studies are included in which ascertainment was restricted to fetuses with abnormal ultrasound scans, 262/3730 (7.0%) were reported to have pCNCs.

Indexed as

Cytogenetic AnalysisKaryotypeMicroarray AnalysisChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansMaternal AgePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID23983223
PMCPMC4285999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.