Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23983157›Full record

Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2013

Reconnecting with urban youth enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and overdue for a 12-month follow-up survey.

Jerel M Ezell, Jacquelyn Saltzgaber, Edward Peterson, Christine L M Joseph

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jerel M EzellaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jacquelyn Saltzgaber
Edward Peterson
Christine L M Joseph

Funding

A Tailored Asthma Education Program for Urban Teens IIR01HL068971 · NHLBI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI JOSEPH, CHRISTINE LM · 2002 to 2009
$5.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL068971NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL068971-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetention of study participants in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial to study validity. PURPOSE: We analyzed the results of four retention strategies used to reconnect with urban teens enrolled in a school-based RCT and overdue for a 12-month follow-up survey.

methodsTraditional retention strategies used to reconnect with teens categorized as 'unable to contact' were weekly redials of nonworking telephone numbers and mailings to the student's home. Nontraditional retention strategies were obtaining assistance from school administration and performing outreach on Facebook.

resultsOf the 422 students enrolled, 125 (29.5%) were overdue for a 12-month follow-up survey, but had no working telephone number (unable to contact). We made 196 attempts to contact these 125 students, of which 82 attempts (41.8%) were successful in 'reconnecting' with the student. Using 'mailed reminder letters' as the referent category, odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the association between the strategy used and reconnecting were 4.60 (1.8-11.8), 1.94 (1.01-3.73), and 2.91 (0.58-14.50), respectively, for telephone number redials, Facebook outreach, and school administration assistance. Of the 422 students, 380 (90%) ultimately completed the 12-month follow-up survey. LIMITATIONS: Retention strategies were not applied hierarchically or systematically. We were unable to determine student preference for a particular strategy. Findings are likely only applicable to similar study populations.

conclusionA mix of traditional retention strategies and more contemporary methods was effective in reconnecting with urban teenagers enrolled in a school-based RCT and in controlling attrition during the 12-month follow-up survey period.

Indexed as

Patient DropoutsUrban PopulationAdolescentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePostal ServiceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial NetworkingSocioeconomic FactorsTelephone

Identifiers

PMID23983157
PMCPMC3800210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.