Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23983149›Full record

Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2014

Repeat post-op voiding trials: an inconvenient correlate with success.

Kimberly L Ferrante, Hae-Young Kim, Linda Brubaker, Cliff Y Wai, Peggy A Norton, Stephen R Kraus, Jonathan Shepherd, Larry T Sirls, Charles W Nager, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03048682 (Timing of Repeat Voiding Trials After Outpatient Pelvic Floor Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03048682 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Timing of Repeat Voiding Trials After Outpatient Pelvic Floor Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2017 to 2019Enrolled64ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence,Stress, SurgeryArmsFoley catheter - Early Voiding Trial, Foley catheter - Late Voiding Trial
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly L FerranteUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Hae-Young Kim
Linda Brubaker
Cliff Y Wai
Peggy A Norton
Stephen R Kraus
Jonathan Shepherd
Larry T Sirls
Charles W Nager
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network
University of California, San Diego · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USLoyola University Chicago · USNew England Research Institutes · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: DCCU01DK058229 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 2000 to 2012
$16.1M
UAB Continence Treatment Center U01DK060380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2009
$3.9M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058225 · NIDDK · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2000 to 2009
$3.8M
UCSD INCONTINENCE TREATMENT CENTERU01DK060401 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ALBO, MICHAEL · 2001 to 2010
$3.6M
Continuation of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060379 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2009
$3.6M
UTAH URINARY INCONTINENCE TREATMENT NETWORK (UUITN)U01DK060393 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NORTON, PEGGY A · 2001 to 2009
$3.4M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058231 · NIDDK · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI SIRLS, LARRY T · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHAI, TOBY C · 2001 to 2010
$2.7M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK060395 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERN, PHILIPPE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060401NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD000931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study examined the association between the need for a repeat voiding trial after midurethral sling (MUS) surgery and 1-year success rates.

methodsWe conducted this secondary analysis of the participants in the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network trial of midurethral sling (TOMUS) study which compared retropubic versus transobturator MUS. A standard voiding trial was attempted on all subjects. The "repeat voiding trial" group included subjects discharged with catheterization. All others were considered "self voiding." Success rates between the groups at 1-year were compared, followed by multivariate analyses controlling for previously reported clinical predictors of success.

resultsMost women (76%) were self-voiding, while 24% required a repeat voiding trial. The objective success rate at 1-year was 85.8% in the repeat voiding trial group and 75.3% in the self-voiding group (P = 0.01). Subjective success rate at 1-year was 61.0% in the repeat voiding trial group and 55.1% in the self-voiding group (P = 0.23). Women in the repeat voiding trial group continued to demonstrate greater objective success than the self-voiding group in multivariate analysis that controlled for previous incontinence surgery, pad weight, urethral mobility, urge score, and type of MUS (P = 0.04, OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.22).

conclusionsWomen who require a repeat voiding trial following MUS surgery have greater objective success at 1-year postoperatively when compared to those who are self-voiding at the time of discharge. These results may help reassure women who require catheterization after MUS surgery that their outcome is not compromised by this immediate transient post-operative result.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinationDiagnostic Techniques, UrologicalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative CareRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamicsmidurethral slingstress urinary incontinencevoiding dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID23983149
PMCPMC3937293
OpenAlexW1892736475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.