SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Association of TGF-β1 -509C/T polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Elevated Serum TGF-β1 and the Common PromoterMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Effects of Two Common Promoter Polymorphisms of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 on Breast Cancer Risks in Ahvaz, West South of Iran.Iranian journal of cancer prevention · 2016Article
- Correlation between TGF-β1 gene 29 T > C single nucleotide polymorphism and clinicopathological characteristics of osteosarcoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
- TGF-β1 C-509T and T869C polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) -509C/T polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. The aim of this study was to comprehensively clarify the association between TGF-β1 -509C/T polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. All relevant studies were searched in the electronic databases. The potential sources of heterogeneity were detected with the chi-square-based Q test. The strength of associations between TGF-β1 -509C/T polymorphisms and breast cancer risk was measured by odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Publication bias was tested by Begg's test and Egger's test. A total of 10 studies including 10,913 cases and 14,187 controls were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there was no evidence of significant association of TGF-β1 -509C/T polymorphisms with breast cancer risk (TT vs. CC [OR = 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.83-1.14]; CT vs. CC [OR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.22]; TT + CT vs. CC [OR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.91-1.08]; T allele vs. C allele [OR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.93-1.06]). Similar results were also found in the subgroup analyses by ethnicity and source of control. When stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status, TT genotype and T allele were associated with a decreased ER-positive breast cancer risk (OR = 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.49-0.90 and OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.75-0.96, respectively). The present meta-analysis results suggest that TGF-β1 -509C/T variants may not contribute to the risk of breast cancer overall. However, T allele may be a potential protective factor for developing ER-positive breast cancer. Well-designed studies with larger sample size were required to verify our findings further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.