Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23982839›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2013

ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.

Kaoru Fujinami, Jana Zernant, Ravinder K Chana, Genevieve A Wright, Kazushige Tsunoda, Yoko Ozawa, Kazuo Tsubota, Andrew R Webster, Anthony T Moore, Rando Allikmets and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  9. Stargardt macular dystrophy and therapeutic approaches.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kaoru FujinamiLaboratory of Visual Physiology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Jana Zernant
Ravinder K Chana
Genevieve A Wright
Kazushige Tsunoda
Yoko Ozawa
Kazuo Tsubota
Andrew R Webster
Anthony T Moore
Rando Allikmets
Michel Michaelides
Columbia University · USKeio University · JPMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBTokyo Medical Center · JPUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
Therapeutic approaches for ABCA4-associated disordersR24EY019861 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ALLIKMETS, RANDO L · 2011 to 2015
$7.2M
Completing genetic analysis of the ABCA4 locusR01EY021163 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ALLIKMETS, RANDO L · 2011 to 2014
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY019007NEI NIH HHS EY019861NEI NIH HHS EY021163NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021163NEI NIH HHS R24 EY019861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe applied a recently reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy for screening the ABCA4 gene in a British cohort with ABCA4-associated disease and report novel mutations.

methodsWe identified 79 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABCA4-associated disease who had a single variant identified by the ABCA4 microarray. Comprehensive phenotypic data were obtained, and the NGS strategy was applied to identify the second allele by means of sequencing the entire coding region and adjacent intronic sequences of the ABCA4 gene. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and assessed for pathogenicity by in silico analysis.

resultsOf the 42 variants detected by prescreening with the microarray, in silico analysis suggested that 34, found in 66 subjects, were disease-causing and 8, found in 13 subjects, were benign variants. We detected 42 variants by NGS, of which 39 were classified as disease-causing. Of these 39 variants, 31 were novel, including 16 missense, 7 splice-site-altering, 4 nonsense, 1 in-frame deletion, and 3 frameshift variants. Two or more disease-causing variants were confirmed in 37 (47%) of 79 patients, one disease-causing variant in 36 (46%) subjects, and no disease-causing variant in 6 (7%) individuals.

conclusionsApplication of the NGS platform for ABCA4 screening enabled detection of the second disease-associated allele in approximately half of the patients in a British cohort where one mutation had been detected with the arrayed primer extension (APEX) array. The time- and cost-efficient NGS strategy is useful in screening large cohorts, which will be increasingly valuable with the advent of ABCA4-directed therapies.

Indexed as

MutationPedigreeAdolescentAdultAgedAllelesATP-Binding Cassette TransportersChildChild, PreschoolDNAElectroretinographyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansIncidenceMacular DegenerationABCA4 protein, humanATP-Binding Cassette TransportersDNAABCA4next generation sequencingStargardt disease

Identifiers

PMID23982839
PMCPMC3796939
OpenAlexW2015944929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.