[Second victim : Deliberations on dealing with treatment complications].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Packed red blood cells-Avoidable risks and complications].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026
   Review
2. The impact of adverse patient events among German anesthesiologists : A cross-sectional survey on the second victim phenomenon (SeViD-X).BMC anesthesiology · 2025
   Article
3. Congratulation, Appraisal, and Comment on the 25 Years Anniversary of Serious Hazards of Blood Transfusion.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
   Article
4. [Patron saints of anesthesia].Der Anaesthesist · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  [Second victim : Critical incident stress management in clinical medicine].2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as