Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23981533›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2014

Numerical Surrogates for Human Observers in Myocardial Motion Evaluation From SPECT Images.

Thibault Marin, Mahdi M Kalayeh, Felipe M Parages, Jovan G Brankov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Task-based assessment of binned and list-mode SPECT systems.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021
    Article
  3. Deep Learning Based Model Observer by U-Net.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thibault Marin
Mahdi M Kalayeh
Felipe M Parages
Jovan G Brankov
Illinois Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

4D IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FOR GATED CARDIAC SPECTR01HL065425 · NHLBI · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WERNICK, MILES N · 2000 to 2009
$2.7M
New Class of Numerical Observers for Nuclear CardiologyR01HL091017 · NHLBI · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRANKOV, JOVAN G · 2008 to 2012
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL065425NHLBI NIH HHS HL091017NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL065425NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical imaging, the gold standard for image-quality assessment is a task-based approach in which one evaluates human observer performance for a given diagnostic task (e.g., detection of a myocardial perfusion or motion defect). To facilitate practical task-based image-quality assessment, model observers are needed as approximate surrogates for human observers. In cardiac-gated SPECT imaging, diagnosis relies on evaluation of the myocardial motion as well as perfusion. Model observers for the perfusion-defect detection task have been studied previously, but little effort has been devoted toward development of a model observer for cardiac-motion defect detection. In this work, we describe two model observers for predicting human observer performance in detection of cardiac-motion defects. Both proposed methods rely on motion features extracted using previously reported deformable mesh model for myocardium motion estimation. The first method is based on a Hotelling linear discriminant that is similar in concept to that used commonly for perfusion-defect detection. In the second method, based on relevance vector machines (RVM) for regression, we compute average human observer performance by first directly predicting individual human observer scores, and then using multi reader receiver operating characteristic analysis. Our results suggest that the proposed RVM model observer can predict human observer performance accurately, while the new Hotelling motion-defect detector is somewhat less effective.

Indexed as

Expert SystemsAlgorithmsBiomimeticsCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMotionMyocardial Perfusion ImagingObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector MachineTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Identifiers

PMID23981533
PMCPMC4148467
OpenAlexW2049971390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.