Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23980183›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Comparative genomics boosts target prediction for bacterial small RNAs.

Patrick R Wright, Andreas S Richter, Kai Papenfort, Martin Mann, Jörg Vogel, Wolfgang R Hess, Rolf Backofen, Jens Georg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 252 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Distribution of prophage-encoded Pas sRNAs across pathogenicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Origin and adaptive evolutionary trajectory of the 3' UTR-derived sRNA UhpU in Enterobacteriaceae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Linking Virulence and Iron Limitation Response inJournal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  9. What makes a small RNA work?Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. mBio · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. An RNase III-processed sRNA coordinates sialic acid metabolism ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Investigating the role of theFEMS microbes · 2025
    Article
  20. Prediction of Circular RNA Secondary Structures and Their Targets.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Patrick R WrightGenetics and Experimental Bioinformatics, Faculty of Biology, Centre for Biological Systems Analysis, and BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas S Richter
Kai Papenfort
Martin Mann
Jörg Vogel
Wolfgang R Hess
Rolf Backofen
Jens Georg
Institute for Systems Analysis · RUInstitut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique · FRUniversity of Freiburg · DEPrinceton University · USUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small RNAs (sRNAs) constitute a large and heterogeneous class of bacterial gene expression regulators. Much like eukaryotic microRNAs, these sRNAs typically target multiple mRNAs through short seed pairing, thereby acting as global posttranscriptional regulators. In some bacteria, evidence for hundreds to possibly more than 1,000 different sRNAs has been obtained by transcriptome sequencing. However, the experimental identification of possible targets and, therefore, their confirmation as functional regulators of gene expression has remained laborious. Here, we present a strategy that integrates phylogenetic information to predict sRNA targets at the genomic scale and reconstructs regulatory networks upon functional enrichment and network analysis (CopraRNA, for Comparative Prediction Algorithm for sRNA Targets). Furthermore, CopraRNA precisely predicts the sRNA domains for target recognition and interaction. When applied to several model sRNAs, CopraRNA revealed additional targets and functions for the sRNAs CyaR, FnrS, RybB, RyhB, SgrS, and Spot42. Moreover, the mRNAs gdhA, lrp, marA, nagZ, ptsI, sdhA, and yobF-cspC were suggested as regulatory hubs targeted by up to seven different sRNAs. The verification of many previously undetected targets by CopraRNA, even for extensively investigated sRNAs, demonstrates its advantages and shows that CopraRNA-based analyses can compete with experimental target prediction approaches. A Web interface allows high-confidence target prediction and efficient classification of bacterial sRNAs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase SequenceComputational BiologyEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsPhylogenyRNA, BacterialSalmonella entericaRNA, BacterialE. coliregulatory RNARNA–RNA interaction

Identifiers

PMID23980183
PMCPMC3773804
OpenAlexW2091356219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.