Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23980156›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Lessons from application of the UNRES force field to predictions of structures of CASP10 targets.

Yi He, Magdalena A Mozolewska, Pawel Krupa, Adam K Sieradzan, Tomasz K Wirecki, Adam Liwo, Khatuna Kachlishvili, Shalom Rackovsky, Dawid Jagiela, Rafał Ślusarz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computational Models for the Study of Protein Aggregation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Protein homology model refinement by large-scale energy optimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. My 65 years in protein chemistry.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yi HeBaker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1301.
Magdalena A Mozolewska
Pawel Krupa
Adam K Sieradzan
Tomasz K Wirecki
Adam Liwo
Khatuna Kachlishvili
Shalom Rackovsky
Dawid Jagiela
Rafał Ślusarz
Cezary R Czaplewski
Stanisław Ołdziej
Harold A Scheraga

Funding

INTERNAL BONDIN IN PROTEINSR01GM014312 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI MAISURADZE, GIA, RACKOVSKY, SHALOM R · 1985 to 2021
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-14312NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM014312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of the physics-based protocol, whose main component is the United Residue (UNRES) physics-based coarse-grained force field, developed in our laboratory for the prediction of protein structure from amino acid sequence, is illustrated. Candidate models are selected, based on probabilities of the conformational families determined by multiplexed replica-exchange simulations, from the 10th Community Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP10). For target T0663, classified as a new fold, which consists of two domains homologous to those of known proteins, UNRES predicted the correct symmetry of packing, in which the domains are rotated with respect to each other by 180° in the experimental structure. By contrast, models obtained by knowledge-based methods, in which each domain is modeled very accurately but not rotated, resulted in incorrect packing. Two UNRES models of this target were featured by the assessors. Correct domain packing was also predicted by UNRES for the homologous target T0644, which has a similar structure to that of T0663, except that the two domains are not rotated. Predictions for two other targets, T0668 and T0684_D2, are among the best ones by global distance test score. These results suggest that our physics-based method has substantial predictive power. In particular, it has the ability to predict domain-domain orientations, which is a significant advance in the state of the art.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularBiophysical PhenomenaHumansProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsProteinsmulti-domain packingprotein foldingstructure symmetry

Identifiers

PMID23980156
PMCPMC3773777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.