Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23980099›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2013

Negative selection, not receptor editing, is a physiological response of autoreactive thymocytes.

Taras Kreslavsky, Hye-Jung Kim, Sergei B Koralov, Dvora Ghitza, Thorsten Buch, Harvey Cantor, Klaus Rajewsky, Harald von Boehmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deciphering thymic development.Frontiers in immunology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Taras KreslavskyDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and 2 Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, and Immune Disease Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Hye-Jung Kim
Sergei B Koralov
Dvora Ghitza
Thorsten Buch
Harvey Cantor
Klaus Rajewsky
Harald von Boehmer
Boston Children's Hospital · USInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

BCR signaling during B cell development and maintenanceR37AI054636 · NIAID · IMMUNE DISEASE INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARROLL, MICHAEL CRAIG · 2003 to 2012
$5.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI054636PHS HHS R01 A145846PHS HHS R01 A151378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen receptor editing-a process of secondary rearrangements of antigen receptor genes in autoreactive lymphocytes-is a well-established tolerance mechanism in B cells, whereas its role in T cells remains controversial. Here, we investigated this issue using a novel Tcra knock-in locus, which ensured appropriate timing of TCRα expression and allowed secondary rearrangements. Under these conditions the only response to self-antigen that could be unambiguously identified was negative selection of CD4/CD8 double positive thymocytes. No evidence could be obtained for antigen-induced TCR editing, whereas replacement of the transgenic TCRα chain by ongoing gene rearrangement occurred in some cells irrespective of the presence or absence of self-antigen.

Indexed as

Gene Rearrangement, alpha-Chain T-Cell Antigen ReceptorAnimalsAutoantigensClonal Selection, Antigen-MediatedFemaleGene OrderGene TargetingGenetic LociMaleMiceMice, TransgenicPhenotypeReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaThymocytesAutoantigensReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta

Identifiers

PMID23980099
PMCPMC3782038
OpenAlexW2101423854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.