Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23980091›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Gefitinib versus placebo in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the NCIC CTG BR19 study.

Glenwood D Goss, Chris O'Callaghan, Ian Lorimer, Ming-Sound Tsao, Gregory A Masters, James Jett, Martin J Edelman, Rogerio Lilenbaum, Hak Choy, Fadlo Khuri and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02526537 (The Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy of Gefitinib for High Risk Stage Ib NSCLC Patients With EGFR Sensitive Mutation, an Open, Paired, Non-interventional, Multi-center Clinical Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 171 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02526537 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy of Gefitinib for High Risk Stage Ib NSCLC Patients With EGFR Sensitive Mutation, an Open, Paired, Non-interventional, Multi-center Clinical Study

TypeobservationalSponsorLunxu LiuRan2015 to 2016Enrolled10ConditionsNSCLC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. SELECT: A Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Erlotinib in Patients With Resected Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Glenwood D GossGlenwood D. Goss and Ian Lorimer, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Chris O'Callaghan and Keyue Ding, NCIC CTG, Queens University, Kingston; Ming-Sound Tsao and Frances A. Shepherd, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto; Jonathan Noble, Northeast Cancer Center, Sudbury, Ontario; Charles Butts, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Gregory A. Masters, Christiana Care's Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE; James Jett, National Jewish Health, Division of Oncology, Denver, CO; Martin J. Edelman, Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Rogerio Lilenbaum, Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Hak Choy, Kemp Kernstine, and Joan Schiller, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Katherine Pisters, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Fadlo Khuri, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; David Gandara, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Thomas A. Hensing, NorthShore University Health System, The University of Chicago, Chicago; and Kendrith Rowland, Carle Cancer Center, Urbana, IL.
Chris O'Callaghan
Ian Lorimer
Ming-Sound Tsao
Gregory A Masters
James Jett
Martin J Edelman
Rogerio Lilenbaum
Hak Choy
Fadlo Khuri
Katherine Pisters
David Gandara
Kemp Kernstine
Charles Butts
Jonathan Noble
Thomas A Hensing
Kendrith Rowland
Joan Schiller
Keyue Ding
Frances A Shepherd
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCIC Foreign AccrualsU10CA077202 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI EISENHAUER, ELIZABETH · 1998 to 2013
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U10 CA077202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurvival of patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unsatisfactory, and in 2002, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was not established. This phase III study assessed the impact of postoperative adjuvant gefitinib on overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with completely resected (stage IB, II, or IIIA) NSCLC stratified by stage, histology, sex, postoperative radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib 250 mg per day or placebo for 2 years. Study end points were OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity.

resultsAs a result of early closure, 503 of 1,242 planned patients were randomly assigned (251 to gefitinib and 252 to placebo). Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. With a median of 4.7 years of follow-up (range, 0.1 to 6.3 years), there was no difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.64; P = .14) or DFS (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.61; P = .15) between the arms. Exploratory analyses demonstrated no DFS (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.76; P = .14) or OS benefit (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.71; P = .18) from gefitinib for 344 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type tumors. Similarly, there was no DFS (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.44 to 7.73; P = .395) or OS benefit (HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 0.61 to 16.45; P = .15) from gefitinib for the 15 patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors. Adverse events were those expected with an EGFR inhibitor. Serious adverse events occurred in ≤ 5% of patients, except infection, fatigue, and pain. One patient in each arm had fatal pneumonitis.

conclusionAlthough the trial closed prematurely and definitive statements regarding the efficacy of adjuvant gefitinib cannot be made, these results indicate that it is unlikely to be of benefit.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGefitinibHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingPlacebosProspective StudiesQuinazolinesSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsGefitinibPlacebosQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID23980091
PMCPMC3770864
OpenAlexW2102625113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.