Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23979955›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2013

The effect of three or six years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM extension.

Henry G Bone, Roland Chapurlat, Maria-Luisa Brandi, Jacques P Brown, Edward Czerwinski, Marc-Antoine Krieg, Dan Mellström, Sebastião C Radominski, Jean-Yves Reginster, Heinrich Resch and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06706414 (Novel Treatment of Some Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06706414 phase1 / phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Novel Treatment of Some Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NT-NOA): A Clinical Interventional Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMartin Blomberg JensenRan2025 to 2026Enrolled16ConditionsInfertility, MaleArmsDenosumab (Prolia), Letrozole (Aromatase Inhibitors)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment goals with denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Trial
  8. One versus 2 years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  11. The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Further reductions in nonvertebral fracture rate with long-term denosumab treatment in the FREEDOM open-label extension and influence of hip bone mineral density after 3 years.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  15. The effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  16. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients previously treated with zoledronic acid.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  17. Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: development history and design and participant characteristics of LOFT, the Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  18. Three-year denosumab treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women and men with osteoporosis: results from a 1-year open-label extension of the Denosumab Fracture Intervention Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial (DIRECT).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  19. A new age of osteoanabolic therapy? A real-world, two-centre study comparing effects of romosozumab, teriparatide, and antiresorptive therapies for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Henry G BoneMD, Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, 22201 Moross Road, Suite 260, Detroit, Michigan 48236. hgbone.md@att.net.
Roland Chapurlat
Maria-Luisa Brandi
Jacques P Brown
Edward Czerwinski
Marc-Antoine Krieg
Dan Mellström
Sebastião C Radominski
Jean-Yves Reginster
Heinrich Resch
Jose A Román Ivorra
Christian Roux
Eric Vittinghoff
Nadia S Daizadeh
Andrea Wang
Michelle N Bradley
Nathalie Franchimont
Michelle L Geller
Rachel B Wagman
Steven R Cummings
Socrates Papapoulos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM) extension is evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab for up to 10 years.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to report results from the first 3 years of the extension, representing up to 6 years of denosumab exposure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis was a multicenter, international, open-label study of 4550 women.

interventionWomen from the FREEDOM denosumab group received 3 more years of denosumab for a total of 6 years (long-term) and women from the FREEDOM placebo group received 3 years of denosumab (crossover).

main outcome measuresBone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), fracture, and safety data are reported.

resultsReductions in BTMs were maintained (long-term) or achieved rapidly (crossover) after denosumab administration. In the long-term group, BMD further increased for cumulative 6-year gains of 15.2% (lumbar spine) and 7.5% (total hip). During the first 3 years of denosumab treatment, the crossover group had significant gains in lumbar spine (9.4%) and total hip (4.8%) BMD, similar to the long-term group during the 3-year FREEDOM trial. In the long-term group, fracture incidences remained low and below the rates projected for a virtual placebo cohort. In the crossover group, 3-year incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar to those of the FREEDOM denosumab group. Incidence rates of adverse events did not increase over time. Six participants had events of osteonecrosis of the jaw confirmed by adjudication. One participant had a fracture adjudicated as consistent with atypical femoral fracture.

conclusionDenosumab treatment for 6 years remained well tolerated, maintained reduced bone turnover, and continued to increase BMD. Fracture incidence remained low.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone DensityCross-Over StudiesDenosumabFemaleFractures, BoneHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPlacebosRANK LigandRisk FactorsTimeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDenosumabPlacebosRANK Ligand

Identifiers

PMID23979955
PMCPMC4207950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.