Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23979928›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2013

Comparing zinc finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases for gene targeting in Drosophila.

Kelly J Beumer, Jonathan K Trautman, Michelle Christian, Timothy J Dahlem, Cathleen M Lake, R Scott Hawley, David J Grunwald, Daniel F Voytas, Dana Carroll

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Can Designer Indels Be Tailored by Gene Editing?: Can Indels Be Customized?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Profile of Dana Carroll.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Insights into maize genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Biasing genome-editing events toward precise length deletions with an RNA-guided TevCas9 dual nuclease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Development of TALE Nucleases for Biotechnology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Making designer mutants in model organisms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelly J BeumerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112.
Jonathan K Trautman
Michelle Christian
Timothy J Dahlem
Cathleen M Lake
R Scott Hawley
David J Grunwald
Daniel F Voytas
Dana Carroll

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J., STANFIELD, GILLIAN · 1985 to 2020
$6.1M
Optimizing Genome Engineering with Targetable NucleasesR01GM078571 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CARROLL, DANA · 2006 to 2017
$4.3M
DNA targeting by TAL effectorsR01GM098861 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOGDANOVE, ADAM J, STODDARD, BARRY L. · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
Role of Intracellular Calcium Release in Hedgehog Growth Factor SignalingR21HD065169 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J. · 2010 to 2011
$400k
NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA042014NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD065169NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD065169NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM078571NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078571NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098861NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc-finger nucleases have proven to be successful as reagents for targeted genome manipulation in Drosophila melanogaster and many other organisms. Their utility has been limited, however, by the significant failure rate of new designs, reflecting the complexity of DNA recognition by zinc fingers. Transcription activator-like effector (TALE) DNA-binding domains depend on a simple, one-module-to-one-base-pair recognition code, and they have been very productively incorporated into nucleases (TALENs) for genome engineering. In this report we describe the design of TALENs for a number of different genes in Drosophila, and we explore several parameters of TALEN design. The rate of success with TALENs was substantially greater than for zinc-finger nucleases , and the frequency of mutagenesis was comparable. Knockout mutations were isolated in several genes in which such alleles were not previously available. TALENs are an effective tool for targeted genome manipulation in Drosophila.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEndodeoxyribonucleasesGene TargetingZinc FingersEndodeoxyribonucleases

Identifiers

PMID23979928
PMCPMC3789796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.