ArticleInfection2014
Tigecycline in febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies: a retrospective case documentation in four university hospitals.
Article in Infection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tigecycline as salvage treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with haematological malignancies-a retrospective single-centre analysis of 200 cases.Annals of hematology · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Tigecycline as Salvage Therapy in Multidrug-Resistant Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Acute Leukemia-A Single Center Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Empiric Antibiotic Escalation Therapy with Vancomycin (VAN) versus Linezolid (LIN) in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Preliminary experience with tigecycline treatment for severe infection in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
- Preliminary experience of tigecycline treatment for infection in children with hematologic malignancies.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Empirical antimicrobial treatment in haemato-/oncological patients with neutropenic sepsis.ESMO open · 2018Review
- Diagnosis and empirical treatment of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in adult neutropenic patients: guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).Annals of hematology · 2017Review
- The Antibiotic Drug Tigecycline: A Focus on its Promising Anticancer Properties.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Review
- The prevention and management of infections due to multidrug resistant organisms in haematology patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTigecycline (TGC) is a first-in-class glycylcycline with an expanded spectrum of activity. Although TGC has not been prospectively studied in febrile neutropenia (FN), we observed that occasionally critically ill neutropenic patients unresponsive to other antibiotics were treated with TGC in our departments. The aim of our study was to analyse effectiveness and toxicity of TGC in FN.
methodsData of infectious episodes treated with TGC were retrospectively collected. Baseline data of patients, haematological malignancy, infection and adverse events were documented. Success was defined as defervescence (≥7 days) in the absence of any sign of persistent infection.
resultsData of 35 patients with haematological malignancies and FN were evaluated. Median duration of neutropenia was 25 days (range 6-69 days). The type of infection was pneumonia in 24 patients, four microbiologically documented infections, three clinically documented infections and four with fever of unknown origin. The TGC was administered after a median of two (range 1-5) prior antibiotic regimens. Treatment was successful in 15 (43 %) patients. In patients with prolonged neutropenia (≥28 days), response was significantly lower (13 vs. 79 %; p =0.001). Eight (23 %) patients died during the fever episode. Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in five (14 %) patients.
conclusionOur results showed promising response rates to TGC and very low toxicity rates compared to the generally low response rate of third-line antibiotic therapies, indicating that TGC may be a successful alternative for salvage treatment of febrile neutropenia, but further study is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.