ReviewDer Nervenarzt2013
[New indications for deep brain stimulation: ethical criteria for research and therapy].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The applications of deep brain stimulation (DBS) are rapidly increasing and now include a large variety of neurological and psychiatric diseases, such as depression, obsessive compulsive disorders, addiction, Alzheimer's disease, anorexia nervosa and rare movement disorders. These new applications confer a huge therapeutic potential in diseases for which often no treatment exists or which are refractory to existing therapies. This spread of applications, however, implies ethical problems in several domains: clinical use, research and presentation in the media and public. Thus, a systematic ethical analysis is needed to inform and guide this process. In this article we identify ethical problems involved in research and clinical use of novel DBS applications, suggest criteria and distinctions for structuring the ethical analysis, and articulate ethical demands for DBS research of novel applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23979358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.