Observational studyWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2013
Are there differences in LDL-C target value attainment in Austrian federal states? Yes!
Observational study in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- PCSK9 inhibitors in real life-Cardiometabolic risk management in dyslipidemic patients in Vienna.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Evolocumab effectiveness in the real-world setting: Austrian data from the pan-European observational HEYMANS study.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Observational
- Article
- Lipid lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention in Austria: are LDL-C goals achieved? : Results from the DA VINCI study.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledLow density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels determine the cardiovascular risk. Previous studies indicated an LDL-C target attainment of around 50%, but no Austrian wide analysis on results for the federal states was available. We therefore sought to detect potential differences.
designOpen-label, non-interventional, longitudinal study, registered: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT 01381679. In all, 746 statin treated patients not at LDL-C goal received intensified therapy for 12 months. The sample was split into nine subgroups, representing the federal states of Austria.We detected an east-west gradient for baseline LDL-C. Individual target values were achieved by 37.2% (range: 26.1-57.7%). After 12 months, LDL-C < 70 mg/l was achieved by 13.5% (5.9-38.5%). Univariate ANCOVA retrieved significant differences within the states (Upper Austria and Salzburg, p = 0.001 and p = 0.0015, respectively). Furthermore, the capacity of intensified lipid lowering therapy applied in practice was as high as -42% as compared to previous standard therapy (additional LDL-C reduction after switch from baseline therapy in Vorarlberg).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.