ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2014
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire in an Australian compensable population.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Youth baseline and state pain-related injustice appraisals are associated with emotional responses of anger and sadness: An experimental study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Validation of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in a spinal cord injury population.Spinal cord · 2021Article
- [Validation of the German-language version of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in five outpatient clinics].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
- Workplace and non-workplace mild traumatic brain injuries in an outpatient clinic sample: A case-control study.PloS one · 2018Article
- The association between injustice perception and psychological outcomes in an inpatient spinal cord injury sample: the mediating effects of anger.Spinal cord · 2017Article
- Traumatic injury and perceived injustice: Fault attributions matter in a "no-fault" compensation state.PloS one · 2017Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examined the factor structure of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ; Sullivan et al. in J Occup Rehabil 18:249-261, 2008) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Two models were proposed for analysis: a single factor and a two-factor model.
methodsA total of 150 participants (81 males and 69 females, mean age = 45.48 years, SD = 10.71), with a chronic work-related musculoskeletal disorder (53 % back condition), and a mean duration of work disability of 4.34 years (SD = 5.14), completed the IEQ and measures of depression and anger. CFA was performed on the IEQ data using the maximum likelihood estimation method.
resultsNeither proposed model provided an acceptable fit; however, a good fitting model with two highly correlated factors and one error covariance was derived through post hoc model fitting. The two-factors were differentially correlated to depression and duration of work disability, but not anger.
conclusionsThe IEQ appears to be a useful tool to support the comprehensive psychosocial assessment of injured workers with long-term disability secondary to a musculoskeletal disorder. In addition to identifying perceived injustice, the IEQ may also be used to inform the choice of psychological interventions. The IEQ has construct validity and generalizability across different populations of injured workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23979003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.