Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015
   Pooled it
2. Developmental origins of variability in pelvic dimensions: Evidence from nulliparous South Asian women in the United Kingdom.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2020
   Article
3. Determining the Incidence of Gynecoid Pelvis Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Nonpregnant Multiparous Women.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply: To PMID 23467050.2014
• Comment on
  Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.2013

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as