ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2013
Inactivation of the ventral lateral geniculate and nucleus of the optic tract impairs retention of visual eyeblink conditioning.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Representation of Associative Threat Learning in Pulvinar Divisions, Lateral Geniculate Nucleus, and Mediodorsal Thalamus in Humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Progressive thalamic nuclear atrophy in blepharospasm and blepharospasm-oromandibular dystonia.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Amygdala central nucleus modulation of cerebellar learning with a visual conditioned stimulus.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2018Article
- Cerebellar learning mechanisms.Brain research · 2015Review
- The impact of hippocampal lesions on trace-eyeblink conditioning and forebrain-cerebellar interactions.Behavioral neuroscience · 2015Review
- Learning-related neuronal activity in the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus during associative cerebellar learning.Journal of neurophysiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reversible inactivation was used to examine the conditioned stimulus (CS) pathway for visual eyeblink conditioning (EBC). Previous research has shown that the ventral lateral geniculate (LGNv) and nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) could play a role in visual EBC through ipsilateral projections to the medial pontine nuclei. Rats were given visual EBC followed by inactivation of the ventral lateral geniculate (LGNv), nucleus of the optic tract (NOT), or both nuclei contralateral to the conditioned eye. Muscimol infusions into the NOT or LGNv impaired retention. Combined inactivation of LGNv/NOT produced the most severe impairment. Rats given inactivation of these visual nuclei after training with a vibration CS showed no impairment. The findings indicate that a parallel pathway of visual CS information projects from the LGNv and NOT to the medial pontine nuclei.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.