Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23978129›Full record

ArticlePsychology & health2014

Adherence, expectations and the placebo response: why is good adherence to an inert treatment beneficial?

Cinnamon Stetler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology & health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Psychometric Evaluation of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS) in the Context of a Smoking Cessation Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Active Inference Approach to Dissecting Reasons for Nonadherence to Antidepressants.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. How placebo characteristics can influence estimates of intervention effects in trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment expectations but not preference affect outcome in a trial of CBT and exercise for pain.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cinnamon Stetlera Department of Psychology , Furman University , Greenville , SC , USA.

Funding

South Carolina IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research (SC INBRE V)P20GM103499 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI EDIE C GOLDSMITH · 2012 to 2026
$61.0M
Supplement for South Carolina BRIN - 1P20 RR16461P20RR016461 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DEAVOR, JAMES · 2001 to 2011
$32.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS 5 P20 RR016461NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016461NIGMS NIH HHS 8 P20 GM103499NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study sought to better understand why good adherence to a placebo treatment has been reliably associated with health benefits. We proposed a model where initial expectations shape adherence, which then influences subsequent expectations that affect placebo response.

designSeventy-two participants were told that they were enrolling in a study of physical activity and memory, and were asked to increase their physical activity by 35% for two weeks (placebo treatment).

main outcome measuresAdherence to this physical activity target was measured by pedometer. Expectations and short-term memory (free recall) were assessed before and after physical activity.

resultsInitial expectations predicted adherence to physical activity (r = .27, p < .03), but adherence did not predict subsequent expectations (r = .06, p = .60). Testing a multi-step meditational model revealed that initial expectations predicted better memory even after controlling for adherence, subsequent expectations, baseline memory and gender (c' = 1.10, 95% CI = .46-1.74). Stronger expectations for memory improvement predicted better memory performance, but adherence and later expectations did not mediate this association.

conclusionsGood adherence to a placebo may reflect strong treatment expectations which may convey benefits by enhancing the non-specific effects of treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthMotor ActivityPlacebo EffectAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23978129
PMCPMC3851940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.