Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23977298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Functional genomic analyses of two morphologically distinct classes of Drosophila sensory neurons: post-mitotic roles of transcription factors in dendritic patterning.

Eswar Prasad R Iyer, Srividya Chandramouli Iyer, Luis Sullivan, Dennis Wang, Ramakrishna Meduri, Lacey L Graybeal, Daniel N Cox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Organismal landscape of clock cells and circadian gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Golgi-Dependent Copper Homeostasis Sustains Synaptic Development and Mitochondrial Content.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Homeostatic Roles of the Proteostasis Network in Dendrites.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eswar Prasad R IyerSchool of Systems Biology, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America.
Srividya Chandramouli Iyer
Luis Sullivan
Dennis Wang
Ramakrishna Meduri
Lacey L Graybeal
Daniel N Cox
Institute for Advanced Study · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

Drosophila Transgenic RNAi Resource ProjectR01GM084947 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2008 to 2019
$9.8M
Investigating the Molecular Bases of Class-Specific Dendrite MorphogenesisR15MH086928 · NIMH · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI COX, DANIEL N · 2009 to 2012
$649k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084947NIMH NIH HHS (MH086928-02NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH086928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurons are one of the most structurally and functionally diverse cell types found in nature, owing in large part to their unique class specific dendritic architectures. Dendrites, being highly specialized in receiving and processing neuronal signals, play a key role in the formation of functional neural circuits. Hence, in order to understand the emergence and assembly of a complex nervous system, it is critical to understand the molecular mechanisms that direct class specific dendritogenesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe have used the Drosophila dendritic arborization (da) neurons to gain systems-level insight into dendritogenesis by a comparative study of the morphologically distinct Class-I (C-I) and Class-IV (C-IV) da neurons. We have used a combination of cell-type specific transcriptional expression profiling coupled to a targeted and systematic in vivo RNAi functional validation screen. Our comparative transcriptomic analyses have revealed a large number of differentially enriched/depleted gene-sets between C-I and C-IV neurons, including a broad range of molecular factors and biological processes such as proteolytic and metabolic pathways. Further, using this data, we have identified and validated the role of 37 transcription factors in regulating class specific dendrite development using in vivo class-specific RNAi knockdowns followed by rigorous and quantitative neurometric analysis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study reports the first global gene-expression profiles from purified Drosophila C-I and C-IV da neurons. We also report the first large-scale semi-automated reconstruction of over 4,900 da neurons, which were used to quantitatively validate the RNAi screen phenotypes. Overall, these analyses shed global and unbiased novel insights into the molecular differences that underlie the morphological diversity of distinct neuronal cell-types. Furthermore, our class-specific gene expression datasets should prove a valuable community resource in guiding further investigations designed to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying class specific neuronal patterning.

Indexed as

AnimalsCluster AnalysisDendritesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenomicsMitosisNeurogenesisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsRNA InterferenceSensory Receptor CellsTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23977298
PMCPMC3744488
OpenAlexW2061756436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.