Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23977228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Raman microspectroscopy analysis in the treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis.

Giulia Rusciano, Paola Capriglione, Giuseppe Pesce, Salvatore Del Prete, Gilda Cennamo, David Di Cave, Luciano Cerulli, Antonio Sasso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterisation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  6. Scalable nanolaminated SERS multiwell cell culture assay.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giulia RuscianoDipartimento di Fisica, Università 'Federico II', Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, Napoli, Italy.
Paola Capriglione
Giuseppe Pesce
Salvatore Del Prete
Gilda Cennamo
David Di Cave
Luciano Cerulli
Antonio Sasso

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a rare but serious corneal disease, often observed in contact lens wearers. Clinical treatment of infected patients frequently involves the use of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), a polymer used as a disinfectant and antiseptic, which is toxic also for the epithelial cells of the cornea. Prompt and effective diagnostic tools are hence highly desiderable for both starting early therapy and timely suspension of the treatment. In this work we use Raman microspectroscopy to analyse in vitro a single Acanthamoeba cell in cystic phase. In particular, we investigate the effect of PHMB at the single-cell level, providing useful information on both the underlying biochemical mechanism and the time frame for Acanthamoeba eradication in ocular infections. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Raman spectroscopy, in conjunction with standard multivariate analysis methods, allows discriminating between live and dead Acanthamoebas, which is fundamental to optimizing patients' treatment.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAmebicidesBiguanidesContact LensesCytoplasmHumansModels, BiologicalMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisSingle-Cell AnalysisSpectrum Analysis, RamanAmebicidesBiguanidespolihexanide

Identifiers

PMID23977228
PMCPMC3748113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.