Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23977123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Machine learning of hierarchical clustering to segment 2D and 3D images.

Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Ryan Kennedy, Toufiq Parag, Jianbo Shi, Dmitri B Chklovskii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Normalized Raman Imaging for Studies of Tissue Physiology of the Kidney.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MitoEM Dataset: Large-scale 3D Mitochondria Instance Segmentation from EM Images.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Analyzing Image Segmentation for Connectomics.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Nunez-IglesiasJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Ryan Kennedy
Toufiq Parag
Jianbo Shi
Dmitri B Chklovskii

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to improve segmentation through the use of machine learning tools during region agglomeration. We propose an active learning approach for performing hierarchical agglomerative segmentation from superpixels. Our method combines multiple features at all scales of the agglomerative process, works for data with an arbitrary number of dimensions, and scales to very large datasets. We advocate the use of variation of information to measure segmentation accuracy, particularly in 3D electron microscopy (EM) images of neural tissue, and using this metric demonstrate an improvement over competing algorithms in EM and natural images.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImaging, Three-DimensionalAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisMicroscopy, ElectronProbability

Identifiers

PMID23977123
PMCPMC3748125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.