Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23977014›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Population cancer risks associated with coal mining: a systematic review.

Wiley D Jenkins, W Jay Christian, Georgia Mueller, K Thomas Robbins

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mapping the Morbidity Risk Associated with Coal Mining in Queensland, Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Telomeres in toxicology: Occupational health.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genotoxicity in adult residents in mineral coal region-a cross-sectional study.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  13. Mortality in Miners with Coal-Workers' Pneumoconiosis in the Czech Republic in the Period 1992-2013.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by coal and coal fly ash particles samples in V79 cells.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  16. Respiratory health effects of occupational exposure to charcoal dust in Namibia.International journal of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wiley D JenkinsCenter for Clinical Research, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United States of America.
W Jay Christian
Georgia Mueller
K Thomas Robbins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoal is produced across 25 states and provides 42% of US energy. With production expected to increase 7.6% by 2035, proximate populations remain at risk of exposure to carcinogenic coal products such as silica dust and organic compounds. It is unclear if population exposure is associated with increased risk, or even which cancers have been studied in this regard.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of English-language manuscripts published since 1980 to determine if coal mining exposure was associated with increased cancer risk (incidence and mortality).

resultsOf 34 studies identified, 27 studied coal mining as an occupational exposure (coal miner cohort or as a retrospective risk factor) but only seven explored health effects in surrounding populations. Overall, risk assessments were reported for 20 cancer site categories, but their results and frequency varied considerably. Incidence and mortality risk assessments were: negative (no increase) for 12 sites; positive for 1 site; and discordant for 7 sites (e.g. lung, gastric). However, 10 sites had only a single study reporting incidence risk (4 sites had none), and 11 sites had only a single study reporting mortality risk (2 sites had none). The ecological study data were particularly meager, reporting assessments for only 9 sites. While mortality assessments were reported for each, 6 had only a single report and only 2 sites had reported incidence assessments.

conclusionsThe reported assessments are too meager, and at times contradictory, to make definitive conclusions about population cancer risk due to coal mining. However, the preponderance of this and other data support many of Hill's criteria for causation. The paucity of data regarding population exposure and risk, the widespread geographical extent of coal mining activity, and the continuing importance of coal for US energy, warrant further studies of population exposure and risk.

Indexed as

Coal MiningDatabases, BibliographicEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansIncidenceLung NeoplasmsMaleOccupational ExposureRiskStomach NeoplasmsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23977014
PMCPMC3744577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.