Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23975817›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2013

Considerations for the use of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in neurobiology.

Jane Kovalevich, Dianne Langford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 504 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
504citing papers in PubMed
86.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

504 citing papers in PubMed, 980 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of the Nervous System in Lung Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

444 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jane KovalevichDepartment of Neuroscience, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dianne Langford
Temple University · US

Funding

Viral Gene Editing and Bioinformatics Core for Institution # 269291P30MH092177 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SHOHREH AMINI · 2011 to 2026
$24.9M
Role of PINCH in neuronal response to HIV infection of the CNSR01MH085602 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LANGFORD, DIANNE TERESA · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH092177NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of primary mammalian neurons derived from embryonic central nervous system tissue is limited by the fact that once terminally differentiated into mature neurons, the cells can no longer be propagated. Transformed neuronal-like cell lines can be used in vitro to overcome this limitation. However, several caveats exist when utilizing cells derived from malignant tumors. In this context, the popular SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line and its use in in vitro systems is described. Originally derived from a metastatic bone tumor biopsy, SH-SY5Y (ATCC(®) CRL-2266™) cells are a subline of the parental line SK-N-SH (ATCC(®) HTB-11™). SK-N-SH were subcloned three times; first to SH-SY, then to SH-SY5, and finally to SH-SY5Y. SH-SY5Y were deposited to the ATCC(®) in 1970 by June L. Biedler.Three important characteristics of SH-SY5Y cells should be considered when using these cells in in vitro studies. First, cultures include both adherent and floating cells, both types of which are viable. Few studies address the biological significance of the adherent versus floating phenotypes, but most reported studies utilize adherent populations and discard the floating cells during media changes. Second, early studies by Biedler's group indicated that the parental differentiated SK-N-SH cells contained two morphologically distinct phenotypes: neuroblast-like cells and epithelial-like cells (Ross et al., J Nat Cancer Inst 71:741-747, 1983). These two phenotypes may correspond to the "N" and "S" types described in later studies in SH-SY5Y by Encinas et al. (J Neurochem 75:991-1003, 2000). Cells with neuroblast-like morphology are positive for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine-β-hydroxylase characteristic of catecholaminergic neurons, whereas the epithelial-like counterpart cells lacked these enzymatic activities (Ross et al., J Nat Cancer Inst 71:741-747, 1983). Third, SH-SY5Y cells can be differentiated to a more mature neuron-like phenotype that is characterized by neuronal markers. There are several methods to differentiate SH-SY5Y cells and are mentioned below. Retinoic acid is the most commonly used means for differentiation and will be addressed in detail.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCryopreservationHumansNeurobiologyNeuroblastoma

Identifiers

PMID23975817
PMCPMC5127451
OpenAlexW2401296772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.