ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2013
Determinants of hospital mortality among patients with sepsis or septic shock receiving appropriate antibiotic treatment.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncovering the potential of Yiqi Huoxue Jiedu formula: a promising adjunct in sepsis and septic shock management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Factor XII Activation Promotes Platelet Consumption in the Presence of Bacterial-Type Long-Chain Polyphosphate In Vitro and In Vivo.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2018Article
- Septic shock and the use of norepinephrine in an intermediate care unit: Mortality and adverse events.PloS one · 2017Article
- An elevated percentage of reticulated platelet is associated with increased mortality in septic shock patients.Medicine · 2015Article
- Cohort profile: Greifswald approach to individualized medicine (GANI_MED).Journal of translational medicine · 2014Article
- Inflammation and cardiac dysfunction during sepsis, muscular dystrophy, and myocarditis.Burns & trauma · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Septic shock affects 750,000 people annually, and accounts for 10 % of all deaths annually in the US. In recent years, outcomes in patients with septic shock have improved; however, mortality still remains high at 40 - 50 %. The use of early protocolized resuscitation goals have been associated with reduced mortality in septic shock. However, strong evidenced-based recommendations for the continued management of patients with septic shock in the ICU setting are currently lacking. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of management in septic shock. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy can lead to treatment failures and adverse outcomes, including high risk of mortality. This article outlines other key factors that contribute to outcome in septic shock. It is challenging for physicians to optimize therapy when fixed patient features such as age and underlying comorbidity can negatively influence mortality. However, outcomes can also potentially be affected by physician management decisions including fluid balance, corticosteroid use, glucose control and adherence to protocols including early goal-directed therapy and infection-control measures. Certain pathogen virulence characteristics also adversely affect outcomes. We give an overview of the determinants of outcome in septic shock in the setting of appropriate antibiotic use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.