Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23975677›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2013

Management of double-refractory multiple myeloma.

Jason P Meadows, Tomer M Mark

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason P MeadowsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1356 Lusitana St. 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA, jmeadows@hawaii.edu.
Tomer M Mark
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread use of the novel agents bortezomib and lenalidomide has improved outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM). Despite remarkable progress, patients will eventually relapse after exhausting treatment with these drugs. Management of myeloma that is refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide (double-refractory MM, DRMM) is complicated due to disease, patient, and treatment-related factors and new therapies for these patients are required. A review of the unique challenges of treating DRMM, recently FDA-approved therapeutic agents, and selected novel drugs under active clinical investigation, is presented below.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBoronic AcidsBortezomibClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideMultiple MyelomaProtease InhibitorsProteasome InhibitorsPyrazinesRecurrenceRetreatmentThalidomideAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideProtease InhibitorsProteasome InhibitorsPyrazinesThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID23975677
OpenAlexW2102372291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.