Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23975606›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2013

Autoimmunity in 2012.

Carlo Selmi

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Autoimmunity in 2016.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Restoring immune tolerance in neuromyelitis optica: Part I.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2016
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Unmet needs in autoimmunity and potential new tools.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Molecular mechanisms in autoimmune type 1 diabetes: a critical review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  10. Autoimmunity in 2013.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlo SelmiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, cfselmi@ucdavis.edu.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initiation and perpetuation of autoimmunity recognize numerous checkpoints, from the genomic susceptibility to the breakdown of tolerance. This latter phenomenon includes the loss of B cell anergy and T regulatory cell failure, as well as the production of autoantibodies and autoreactive T cells. These mechanisms ultimately lead to tissue injury via different mechanisms that span from the production of proinflammatory cytokines to the chemotaxis of immune cells to the target sites. The pathways to autoimmunity have been widely investigated over the past year and resulted in a number of articles in peer-reviewed journals that has increased by nearly 10 % compared to 2011. We herein follow on the attempt to provide a brief discussion of the majority of articles on autoimmune diseases that were published in the major immunology journals in the previous solar year. The selection is necessarily arbitrary and may thus not be seen as comprehensive but reflects current research trends. Indeed, 2012 articles were mostly dedicated to define new and old mechanisms with potential therapeutic implications in autoimmunity in general, though based on specific clinical conditions or animal models. As paradigmatic examples, the environmental influence on autoimmunity, Th17 changes modulating the autoimmune response, serum autoantibodies and B cell changes as biomarkers and therapeutic targets were major issues addressed by experimental articles in 2012. Further, a growing number of studies investigated the sex bias of autoimmunity and supported different working hypotheses to explain the female predominance, including sex chromosome changes and reproductive life factors. In conclusion, the resulting scenario illustrates that common factors may underlie different autoimmune diseases and this is well represented by the observed alterations in interferon-α and TGFβ or by the shared signaling pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesBiomedical ResearchB-LymphocytesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGene-Environment InteractionHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInterferon-alphaMolecular Targeted TherapySex FactorsSignal TransductionTh17 CellsTransforming Growth Factor betaAutoantibodiesInterferon-alphaTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID23975606
OpenAlexW1976380722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.