Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23975226›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid.

Roger von Moos, Jean-Jacques Body, Blair Egerdie, Alison Stopeck, Janet E Brown, Danail Damyanov, Lesley J Fallowfield, Gavin Marx, Charles S Cleeland, Donald L Patrick and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Pain and analgesic use associated with skeletal-related events in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cancer induced bone pain: current management and future perspectives.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Roger von MoosKantonsspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland, Roger.vonmoos@ksgr.ch.
Jean-Jacques Body
Blair Egerdie
Alison Stopeck
Janet E Brown
Danail Damyanov
Lesley J Fallowfield
Gavin Marx
Charles S Cleeland
Donald L Patrick
Felipe G Palazzo
Yi Qian
Ada Braun
Karen Chung
Amgen (United States) · USCancer Research UK · GBKantonsspital Graubünden · CHThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Sussex · GBUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Washington · USUrology Associates · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis analysis evaluated patient-reported outcomes and analgesic use in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours across three comparative studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid.

methodsPooled data were analysed from three identically designed double-blind phase III studies comparing subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg with intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg monthly in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer (n = 2,046), castration-resistant prostate cancer (n = 1,901) or other solid tumours (n = 1,597). Pain severity, pain interference, health-related quality of life and analgesic use were quantified.

resultsAt baseline, approximately half of patients had no/mild pain (53 % [1,386/2,620] denosumab; 50 % [1,297/2,578] zoledronic acid). Denosumab delayed onset of moderate/severe pain by 1.8 months (median, 6.5 vs 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.76-0.92; p < 0.001; 17 % risk reduction) and clinically meaningful increases in overall pain interference by 2.6 months (median, 10.3 vs 7.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.75-0.92; p < 0.001; 17 % risk reduction) compared with zoledronic acid. Strong opioid use and worsening of health-related quality of life were less common with denosumab.

conclusionsAcross three large studies of patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases, denosumab prevented progression of pain severity and pain interference more effectively than zoledronic acid.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsDenosumabDiphosphonatesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesicsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesImidazolesZoledronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23975226
OpenAlexW2039962951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.