ArticleNucleic acids research2013
A modular framework for gene set analysis integrating multilevel omics data.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Multi-omics regulatory network inference in the presence of missing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Complexities of JC Polyomavirus Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms of Infection.Viruses · 2022Review
- Data Integration Challenges for Machine Learning in Precision Medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Multi-Omics Data Integration in Extracellular Vesicle Biology-Utopia or Future Reality?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- MGSEA - a multivariate Gene set enrichment analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis.Genome biology · 2016Review
- From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities.BMC medical genomics · 2015Review
- SimiRa: A tool to identify coregulation between microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins.RNA biology · 2015Article
- KeyPathwayMiner 4.0: condition-specific pathway analysis by combining multiple omics studies and networks with Cytoscape.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Collaborative mining and interpretation of large-scale data for biomedical research insights.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern high-throughput methods allow the investigation of biological functions across multiple 'omics' levels. Levels include mRNA and protein expression profiling as well as additional knowledge on, for example, DNA methylation and microRNA regulation. The reason for this interest in multi-omics is that actual cellular responses to different conditions are best explained mechanistically when taking all omics levels into account. To map gene products to their biological functions, public ontologies like Gene Ontology are commonly used. Many methods have been developed to identify terms in an ontology, overrepresented within a set of genes. However, these methods are not able to appropriately deal with any combination of several data types. Here, we propose a new method to analyse integrated data across multiple omics-levels to simultaneously assess their biological meaning. We developed a model-based Bayesian method for inferring interpretable term probabilities in a modular framework. Our Multi-level ONtology Analysis (MONA) algorithm performed significantly better than conventional analyses of individual levels and yields best results even for sophisticated models including mRNA fine-tuning by microRNAs. The MONA framework is flexible enough to allow for different underlying regulatory motifs or ontologies. It is ready-to-use for applied researchers and is available as a standalone application from http://icb.helmholtz-muenchen.de/mona.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.