Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23974917›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2014

Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations: a 50-state analysis, 2012.

Bridget Gosis, Blake P Sampson, Andrew B Seidenberg, Sophie J Balk, Mark Gottlieb, Alan C Geller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing the content and comprehensiveness of provincial and territorial indoor tanning legislation in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The epidemiology of melanoma in young adults.Expert review of dermatology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bridget GosisHarvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Blake P SampsonBoise Internal Medicine Residency, University of Washington School of Medicine, Boise, Idaho, USA.
Andrew B SeidenbergHarvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sophie J BalkChildren's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Mark GottliebPublic Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alan C GellerHarvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: ageller@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions. There is no federal ban on teen use; rather, it is left to each state to determine policy. We conducted a state-by-state analysis using data from each state's statutes and regulations and supplementary information from the National Conference of State Legislatures. First, we refined an earlier 35-item instrument to now include 56 items that extensively measures age bans, parental involvement, warnings/information, enforcement, and operating requirements. To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with a goal of providing performance data for future comparisons. As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors. In states with some regulations, teen bans are lax-nearly uniformly, most young children under the age of 14 can legally tan with or without suboptimal parental consent or accompaniment laws. Strong Food and Drug Administration involvement can simplify and unify the inconsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws. Until consistent regulations are promulgated and enforced, such an instrument can provide a benchmark for state investigations into the deficiencies and progress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educational purposes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBeauty CultureFemaleHumansMaleParental ConsentSkin NeoplasmsSunbathingUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID23974917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.