Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23974910›Full record

ReviewVirulence2014

Anti-endotoxin vaccines: back to the future.

Alan S Cross

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virulence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Preclinical validation of anMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  4. The endotoxin hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Targeting the Sugary Armor ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan S CrossCenter for Vaccine Development; University of Maryland School of Medicine; Baltimore, MD USA.
University of Baltimore · US

Funding

EVALUATION OF ANTIENDOTOXIN VACCINE FOR HUMAN USER01AI042181 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CROSS, ALAN S. · 1999 to 2006
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS 2R01 AI42181-04ANIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections are a leading cause of serious infections both in hospitals and the community. The mortality remains high despite potent antimicrobials and modern supportive care. In the last decade invasive GNB have become increasingly resistant to commonly used antibiotics, and attempts to intervene with novel biological therapies have been unsuccessful. Earlier studies with antibodies directed against a highly conserved core region in the GNB lipopolysaccharide (LPS, or endotoxin) suggested that this approach may have therapeutic benefit, and led to the development of a subunit vaccine that has progressed to phase 1 clinical testing. Since only a few serogroups of GNB cause bacteremia, O-specific vaccines had been developed, but these were not deployed because of the availability of other therapeutic options at the time. Given the likelihood that new antibiotics will not be soon available, the development of vaccines and antibodies directed against endotoxin, both O and core antigens, deserves a "second look".

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansLipopolysaccharidesSepsisVaccinationBacterial Vaccineslipopolysaccharide, E coli J5Lipopolysaccharidesantibodyclinical trialcore glycolipidgram-negative bacteriaimmunoglobulinlipopolysaccharidesepsisvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23974910
PMCPMC3916378
OpenAlexW1968284615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.