Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23974648›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2013

[Atrial fibrillation in the ICU. Distinct entity--special treatment?].

G Heinz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G HeinzAbteilung für Kardiologie, Intensivstation 13H3, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich, gottfried.heinz@meduniwien.ac.at.
Universitätszahnklinik Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the single most frequent arrhythmia in the intensive care unit, occurring among 44-61 % of all patients with arrhythmias in the intensive care unit. The success rate of electrical cardioversion (DC-CV) early after surgery is as low as 10-35 % in postoperative AF but 6 weeks after discharge 90 % are in sinus rhythm (SR). Several guidelines recommend rate control in these patients and rate control with β-blockers and calcium channel blockers is not inferior with respect to outcome, 6 min walk test, and quality of life. DC-CV is recommended in unstable and heart failure patients. The term resistant AF is suggested for that distinct situation of AF not amenable to cardioversion solely in the acute phase of critical illness.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCalcium Channel BlockersCritical IllnessElectric CountershockElectrocardiographyExercise TestHeart FailureHumansPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnticoagulantsCalcium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID23974648
OpenAlexW138617071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.