Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23973315›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2014

Dopamine D3 and 5-HT1B receptor dysregulation as a result of psychostimulant intake and forced abstinence: Implications for medications development.

Janet L Neisewander, Timothy H C Cheung, Nathan S Pentkowski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Evaluation of SubstitutedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of a 5-HTFrontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Dopamine D3 Receptor Availability Is Associated with Inflexible Decision Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet L NeisewanderSchool of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 874501, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. Electronic address: janet.neisewander@asu.edu.
Timothy H C Cheung
Nathan S Pentkowski
Arizona State University · US

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIORR01DA011064 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NEISEWANDER, JANET L · 1997 to 2018
$4.8M
D3 Receptor Compounds for the Treatment of Psychostimulant AbuseR01DA023957 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI LUEDTKE, ROBERT R · 2007 to 2017
$4.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011064NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addiction to psychostimulants, including cocaine and amphetamine, is associated with dysregulation of dopamine and serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmitter systems. Neuroadaptations in these systems vary depending on the stage of the drug taking-abstinence-relapse cycle. Consequently, the effects of potential treatments that target these systems may vary depending on whether they are given during abstinence or relapse. In this review, we discuss evidence that dopamine D3 receptors (D3Rs) and 5-HT1B receptors (5-HT1BRs) are dysregulated in response to both chronic psychostimulant use and subsequent abstinence. We then review findings from preclinical self-administration models which support targeting D3Rs and 5-HT1BRs as potential medications for psychostimulant dependence. Potential side effects of the treatments are discussed and attention is given to studies reporting positive treatment outcomes that depend on: 1) whether testing occurs during self-administration versus abstinence, 2) whether escalation of drug self-administration has occurred, 3) whether the treatments are given repeatedly, and 4) whether social factors influence treatment outcomes. We conclude that D3/D2 agonists may decrease psychostimulant intake; however, side effects of D3/D2R full agonists may limit their therapeutic potential, whereas D3/D2R partial agonists have fewer undesirable side effects. D3-selective antagonists may not reduce psychostimulant intake during relapse, but nonetheless, may decrease motivation for seeking psychostimulants with relatively few side-effects. 5-HT1BR agonists provide a striking example of treatment outcomes that are dependent on the stage of the addiction cycle. Specifically, these agonists initially increase cocaine's reinforcing effects during maintenance of self-administration, but after a period of abstinence they reduce psychostimulant seeking and the resumption of self-administration. In conclusion, we suggest that factors contributing to dysregulation of monoamine systems, including drug history, abstinence, and social context, should be considered when evaluating potential treatments to better model treatment effects in humans. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'NIDA 40th Anniversary Issue'.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsHumansReceptors, Dopamine D3Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1BSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeCentral Nervous System StimulantsReceptors, Dopamine D3Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1B5-HT(1B) receptors5-HT(1B)RsA(2A)RsAddictionadenosine A(2A) receptorsAmphetaminebasolateral amygdalaBLACeAcentral amygdalaCocaineD3Rsdopamine D3 receptorsdorsal striatumdStelevated plus mazeEPMfixed ratioFRIncentive motivationNAcNAccNAcshnucleus accumbensnucleus accumbens corenucleus accumbens shellobsessive–compulsive disorderOCDPRprogressive ratioReinstatement/extinctionSAself-administrationSelf-administrationvariable intervalventral tegmental areaVIVTA

Identifiers

PMID23973315
PMCPMC4041184
OpenAlexW2035191892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.