ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2013
Predicting critical transitions in a model of systemic inflammation.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dawn of a new era: can machine learning and large language models reshape QSP modeling?Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Review
- Generalized Structural Kinetic Modeling: A Survey and Guide.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Detecting Pathogen Exposure During the Non-symptomatic Incubation Period Using Physiological Data: Proof of Concept in Non-human Primates.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Computational Identification of Mechanistic Factors That Determine the Timing and Intensity of the Inflammatory Response.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- A Chemical Engineer's Perspective on Health and Disease.Computers & chemical engineering · 2014Article
- Global sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model of acute inflammation identifies nonlinear dependence of cumulative tissue damage on host interleukin-6 responses.Journal of theoretical biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human body can be viewed as a dynamical system, with physiological states such as health and disease broadly representing steady states. From this perspective, and given inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity, an important task is identifying the propensity to transition from one steady state to another, which in practice can occur abruptly. Detecting impending transitions between steady states is of significant importance in many fields, and thus a variety of methods have been developed for this purpose, but lack of data has limited applications in physiology. Here, we propose a model-based approach towards identifying critical transitions in systemic inflammation based on a minimal amount of assumptions about the availability of data and the structure of the system. We derived a warning signal metric to identify forthcoming abrupt transitions occurring in a mathematical model of systemic inflammation with a gradually increasing bacterial load. Intervention to remove the inflammatory stimulus was successful in restoring homeostasis if undertaken when the warning signal was elevated rather than waiting for the state variables of the system themselves to begin moving to a new steady state. The proposed combination of data and model-based analysis for predicting physiological transitions represents a step forward towards the quantitative study of complex biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.