Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23973152›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2013

Genomics of pain in osteoarthritis.

M Thakur, J M Dawes, S B McMahon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Lef1 ablation alleviates cartilage mineralization following posttraumatic osteoarthritis induction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. A Monosodium Iodoacetate Osteoarthritis Lameness Model in Growing Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Osteoarthritis pain: nociceptive or neuropathic?Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ThakurNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson CARD, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kings College London Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK. thakurmatthew@gmail.com
J M Dawes
S B McMahon

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) accounts for the majority of the disease burden for musculoskeletal disorders and is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. This disability is the result not of the cartilage loss that defines OA radiographically, but of the chronic pain whose presence defines symptomatic OA. It is becoming clear that many genes, each with a small effect size, contribute to the risk of developing OA. However, the genetics of OA pain are only just starting to be explored. This review will describe the first genes to have been identified in genomic studies of OA pain, as well as the possible dual roles of genes previously identified in genomic studies of OA in the context of pain. Difficulties associated with attempting to characterise the genetics of OA pain will be discussed and promising future avenues of research into genetic and epigenetic factors affecting OA pain described.

Indexed as

GenomicsArthralgiaGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansOsteoarthritisRisk FactorsGeneticsGenomicsGWASNociceptionOsteoarthritisPainSymptomatic

Identifiers

PMID23973152
PMCPMC3769859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.