Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23973134›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2013

Nerve growth factor: an update on the science and therapy.

M F Seidel, B L Wise, N E Lane

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Genetic applications in arthroplasty: A review.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms that drive bone pain across the lifespan.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M F SeidelMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, University Hospital, Section of Rheumatology, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany. Matthias.Seidel@ukb.uni-bonn.de
B L Wise
N E Lane
University of California, Davis · USUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Womens Health at UC Davis - Administrative SupplementK12HD051958 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANE, NANCY E · 2005 to 2023
$9.6M
Translation of Quantitative Imaging in OsteoarthritisP50AR060752 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SOUZA, RICHARD BRIAN · 2011 to 2015
$6.2M
Sex Differences in response to an exercise for hyperkyphosisP50AR063043 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GOLD, ELLEN B. · 2012 to 2017
$5.7M
Midcareer Investigator Award Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AR048841 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI LANE, NANCY E · 2002 to 2013
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR048841NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR060752NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR063043NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD051958NICHD NIH HHS K12HD051958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNerve growth factor (NGF) is a key regulator of nociceptive pain and thus appears to be an interesting target molecule for an innovative class of analgesic medication. We set out to review the principles of neurogenic inflammation and results of anti-NGF regimens in animal studies as well as clinical trials with patients with back pain and osteoarthritis (OA).

designWe searched using Google Scholar Search and Pubmed as well as through conference reports for articles and abstracts related to NGF and clinical trials using anti-NGF regimens. We report on efficacy findings and adverse events (AEs) related to these agents in this review.

resultsWe identified five full articles and eight abstract reports relating to anti-NGF agents studied for use in back pain and in OA.

conclusionsAnti-NGF agents either alone or in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) were more efficacious for the treatment of pain in a number of trials of knee and hip pain compared to NSAIDs alone. However, adverse effects that included rapidly progressive OA and joint replacement were more common in patients treated with anti-NGF and NSAIDs than either treatment alone. Anti-NGF treatment related neurologic symptoms including paresthesias, and potentially other types of adverse effects were usually transient but warrant additional investigation.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBack PainHumansNerve Growth FactorNeuritisOsteoarthritisAnalgesicsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalNerve Growth FactortanezumabNerve growth factorNeurogenic inflammationOsteoarthitisReceptor antagonists

Identifiers

PMID23973134
PMCPMC4252012
OpenAlexW1980716397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.