Response to letter to the editor: regarding "individual and neighborhood correlates of membership in drug-using networks with a higher prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (2006-2009)".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Assessing the geographic coverage and spatial clustering of illicit drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling in New York City.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Individual and neighborhood correlates of membership in drug using networks with a higher prevalence of HIV in New York City (2006-2009).2013
• Comment on
  Letter to the editor: regarding "individual and neighborhood correlates of membership in drug-using networks with a higher prevalence of HIV in New York City (2006-2009)".2013

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as