Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23972197›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

Mortality and morbidity after initial diagnostic excision biopsy of cutaneous melanoma in primary versus secondary care.

Peter Murchie, E Amalraj Raja, Amanda J Lee, Neil C Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of rurality on processes and outcomes in melanoma care: results from a whole-Scotland melanoma cohort in primary and secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  4. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016
    Review
  5. RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2013.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  6. Diagnostic biopsy of melanoma: primary or secondary care?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter MurchieDivision of Applied Health Science, University of Aberdeen. p.murchie@abdn.ac.uk
E Amalraj Raja
Amanda J Lee
Neil C Campbell
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZG/2/559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent UK melanoma guidelines do not support the initial diagnostic excision biopsy of pigmented lesions in primary care, although this is standard in other countries such as Australia. Previous research in Northeast Scotland found that initial diagnostic excision biopsies in primary care that prove to be melanoma were no more likely to be incomplete than those performed in secondary care, but data on longer-term outcomes were not available.

aimTo determine whether initial diagnostic excision biopsy of cutaneous melanoma in primary versus secondary care leads to poorer survival and increased morbidity. DESIGN AND

settingAnalysis of a linked dataset comprising pathological data from melanoma cases diagnosed in Northeast Scotland between 1991 and 2007, the General Registry Office (Scotland) death registry, and an NHS Scotland episode of care database.

methodPatient data from three sources were matched using the Community Health Index (CHI) number. Cox proportional hazards regression, with robust standard error estimates, was used to examine the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of key mortality and morbidity outcomes based on excision in primary versus secondary care. Analysis was conducted before and after adjustment for operator and patient-level factors, using a multilevel approach.

resultsPatients receiving their initial diagnostic excision biopsy for melanoma in primary versus secondary care were no more likely to be dead, or to have died of metastatic malignant melanoma. Patients who had their initial diagnostic excision biopsy for melanoma in primary care had significantly fewer subsequent hospital admissions and spent fewer days in hospital.

conclusionThese findings suggest that initial diagnostic excision biopsy of melanoma in primary care does not lead to poorer long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

BiopsyEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePrognosisScotlandSecondary Health CareSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23972197
PMCPMC3722833
OpenAlexW2126862406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.